Is there a two-tiered justice system and a partisan lawfare happening right before our very eyes to implement a coup against the people of the United States Of America?
Yes and no.
Yes, we are watching unprecedented use of US "Code" being used in a coordinated effort by corrupt Attorneys General, who literally used the concept of "getting Trump" to get elected, namely Alvin Bragg and Leticia James.
Yes there has been proof of coordinated efforts and moving the chess pieces around in order to facilitate the prosecutors, judges and courts to implement these victimless cases against the president and anyone who cheerleads for him.
Last week, former chief strategist and senior Counselor to President Trump, Steve Bannon, host of the highly popular and powerful "War Room" podcast, was ordered to go to Federal prison for misdemeanor contempt, via the same route that former Deputy Assistant to President Trump, Peter Navarro was sentenced to Federal prison in what seems to be the first prison sentence of it's kind for misdemeanor contempt charges.
Additionally, Alex Jones' empire is crumbling because his LLC, Free Speech Systems, has been ordered to be liquidated for merely the mention on his show "Infowars" in regards to questioning the Sandy Hook incident.
What do they all have in common?
No victims to a single crime.
Crime 101 requires a "corpus delecti" or no crime has been committed.
Pay attention to this:
The Supreme Law of law of the land "Trumps" US Code.
I've reached out to all three parties because they can be saved by the Supreme Law of the Land.
US Code applies to the government, not the people.
Advising the president does not violate the rights of the people.
Free speech doesn't violate anyone's rights.
So how can they be saved?
By Supreme Court case law.
By the use of man's law.
By the Common Law.
1795 - SUPREME COURT RULING
NO CORPORATE JURISDICTION OVER THE NATURAL MAN
Penhallow v. Doane’s Administrators (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54)
Supreme Court of the United States 1795, “Inasmuch as every GOVERNMENT is an ARTIFICIAL PERSON, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a GOVERNMENT can interface only with other ARTIFICIAL PERSONS.
The Imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the Tangible.
The legal manifestation of this is that no GOVERNMENT, as well as any Law, agency, aspect, Court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than Corporate, ARTIFICIAL PERSONS and the contracts between them.” S.C.R. 1795, (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54),
Who did the government charge?
Look at all of the indictments.
STEVEN K. BANNON, PETER K. NAVARRO, FREE SPEECH SYSTEMS LLC.
Those are all corporate entities in the eyes of the law, the "artificial person".
That's how the all caps name becomes a legal entity on paper but who pays the price for the detriment of the outcome of the cases.
The living men.
This is so easy to remedy but not ever by a BAR card holder, that is an "attorney at law".
They can only re-present the legal fiction, never the living man.
“For every thousand men who hack at the branches of evil, there is only one who is striking at the root.” Henry David Thoreau
To learn how to exercise your rights and defend yourself from government overreach, join our Inalienable University because your rights are Inalienable.
I am interested in learning from what you offer here, but going through the sign up stages does not allow me to see how things are shared, dispersed to me of information for me to learn from and how the process goes of learning and implementing this material to accomplish stepping away each each category of interest to be truly free from the system. I cannot just sign up and pay without knowing more of how things work here and even though it shows a free 3 day service, you still most likely have to submit cc information. I like what I have heard and read here and on tik tok video shares to sense you have a program th…
I am new to your site and I found you while investigating the Norv Eisenberg letter. I, too have been skeptical of DLS but for issues of a different nature. I have issues with some of DLS's "steps", and of course some initial disagreements with some points you have made, too. But that's where the personal research comes in.
One major point of issue here is the above referenced case. The Penhallow citation is erroneous. It appears to be copypasta from the internet. Bear with me because I don't mean to sound harsh, but if you haven't vetted a simple quote like this, then how am I to trust the other information on your site or beyond your paywall?